I got a call from the guidance councilor at Max's school today (he's 9). Apparently Friday when all the kids were in a line he said "Looks like the white girls are all in front and the black girls are all in the back, like in the olden days." Everyone got offended and today he apologized to the class, although the school was great in that they clearly realized Max is not a racist, just, you know, nine. Also, I love that the counselor doesn't know I'm pretty brown. Max looks like an Aryan poster boy, so having a brown dad is something that will surprise them.
Realistically the only reason he would even know about "the olden days" is we've been watching John Green videos on YouTube, where he has a whole great history session called CrashCourse. WELL WORTH A VIEW. Of course, your kids may end up knowing things about the civil rights movement without any context and make impolitic remarks. So I'm going to have to also have him watch Thank You For Smoking.
If you've built software, you know the feeling when a project is too large and too old to survive. This is not because your coding or initial design was wrong. It's because your requirements have changed and your understanding of the problem has also changed now that you have experience building your old and busted version 1.0.
Imagine you were still using a computer program built in the 70's. Those computers took us to the moon and back! They can do amazing things. But you do not want to try to compete in today's market with them.
The same is true with current schooling in America. It cannot be fixed by more money, in the same way that throwing more money at a broken engineering project (or a war in Afghanistan) cannot fix it. Watch this video, but start at 8 minutes in:
If you've not watched this video, you're missing out on a great summary of the latest research in education.
Even the BEST SCHOOLS are now outdated, strategically broken in several ways only obvious in retrospect. Sal goes into it a lot better than I can here, but I'll point out things I've personally seen in my kids' (B-graded) school, with even with very good teachers.
1. The teachers have to teach to the lowest common denominator.
2. Even doing that, students don't completely learn one concept when they have to move onto the next. (This is the bike analogy from the video).
People think that that Khan Academy is about the website, which it is not. It is more about proposing a revolutionary way to do education as a whole, with the website as one implementation of the idea, the way Word is just one kind of Word Processor but there are others available, with similar concepts behind them.
There are simple things you can see that they take advantage of from the science. For example, you cannot move forward to take a "mastery challenge" on KA without waiting for a day after you do the practice questions. And you have to get 10 right in a row on the mastery challenge to pass it. You can do one thousand questions, and get the last ten right, or just the first ten. Either way is fine.
Those two simple features are the result of a small advancement in educational science. This is why when teachers prefer i-Ready, I watch my kids do it, and I can tell that i-Ready is inferior. It may have nicer graphics, but it doesn't take as much advantage of the things we know are proven to work.
The apple tree in Eden.
Sal Khan also talks a bit about the "Gifted" program. The key strategic issue he addresses in the video is that your "best" students one month can be the most "behind" the next month, although because learning is a tree structure (see above) even that is a bad abstraction.
In conclusion: Having great teachers is not a solution for a broken system. Working the kids harder and harder with more and more homework is not a solution. A complete revolution in education is what you need, and what you get from your school, no doubt, is excuses. I enjoy watching everyone, teachers and parents, complain about Common Core. But without realistic universal metrics, you can't even see the problem. Stop whining about it, teach the kids better, and you don't have to worry about a once a year automated test.
This is rated "mostly true", but is inspirational either way.
